In March 2009 it was clear to me what it was for before and after a few to many: the intentions Rosa Díez policies and their relatives were not what they seemed, or were compatible with what led us to collaborate with them, democratic regeneration. Therefore, do not hesitate to oppose what seemed politically illegitimate and undemocratic. The reaction was Rosa Díez in the Political Council of 28 March before my speech was the beginning of the lifting of carpets and public drop the masks. We could have resolved the situation with intelligence and restraint, but she only made a show of intransigence and aggression. Days later, despite having mostly with the support of my colleagues, I arbitrarily stopped by management, as shown in that match that power comes from above and not below. From these events, I worked to keep information flowing. Management, time and time again, erred in its assessment of the situation. He believed that members were all manipulated and timid but was surprised by what was happening, sometimes bitterly. In successive waves, lots of good people that led the party, probably the majority, were disenchanted and abandoned, some quietly, some not so. Today is a very poor structure, where even the menial and climbers are used and end, sooner or later, disappointed. Abandoned ideas and abandoned by the people, little remains there now.
are among those who have been disappointed those who will dedicate efforts to disseminate what they know, to keep society and the voters are wrong in their assessment due to lack of data. I guess that is their right and certainly it is understandable that you feel cheated cherish the momentum. In my case, having publicly committed to this project failed, my detachment is also known. However, I personally prefer more constructive activities. I must admit that was a rest stop having to deal with those who have spoiled what could be a major political party. My quality of life has increased considerably, to return to more pleasant activities that had neglected. In this adventure I met a few people undesirable, but also several other great. Logically, it is better to spend those and dealt with them. As for politics, I think the same thing when we founded UPyD. Now, the experience that many of us have lived it can lead to abandonment of political activity or learning. Some will also encounter a second or third time in a similar stone. The question can not be resolved from the voluntarism nor for the sentimental way. The political necessity still exists. People increasingly know and we know more. Time to think collectively about what happened. It's time to think about the possibilities and reality. Only then will a constructive experience for anything. Without falling three times in the same stone. Without throwing in the towel.
0 comments:
Post a Comment