approximation of local and regional elections. Some people who know me ask me UPyD. It's logical. For two years, both publicly and privately I spread my support to that political organization. I was part of the group founder, was elected Convener in Aragon and introduced myself as the first candidate for Congress in the list of Zaragoza in the 2008 general election. However, now support of that party. On the contrary, all the people who in one way or another trusted me then, I feel an ethical duty to apologize for having been led to believe in his message or to vote in their favor. That is the intention of this paper. Unwittingly contributed growth of a party that is not what it seemed.
The story is quite simple. Rosa Díez and two others convinced us another 120 to accompany them on the foundation of a game. The ideas were clear. In short, they had to offer society a new political option, completely different from existing rules and the mission of regenerating democracy. In this initiative we were adding more and more popular. Soon it began to be signs that did not fit: the impossibility of internal communication to the Bulgarian Political Councils where decisions were previously made, etc. I could give many examples, but suffice to say that the selection Francisco Sosa Wagner (now MEP) as the first of the European list met her in the press long before it was raised at the Council meeting. That did not seem a new party, but more of the same , but the excuses were varied and at first we were thinking of us.
red alarm me particularly when lit from the Directorate (which incidentally was not democratically elected but appointed by Rosa Díez) presented for approval by the Political Council a regulation which literally pulverized the principles and ideas that we had led to the founding of the party. not open lists, no separation of powers, or incompatibility , or anything that was not concentration of power in the service of the Directorate. We filled his mouth with beautiful words to voters and criticism of other parties but we were not internally implement our own recipes. As I did not like, I submitted an amendment to the whole, attempting to recover the regenerative spirit that both spoke. Grave Dare! I felt threatened, I was dismissed, maligned and slandered. Believing that the game would become a worse than those who wanted to fight, along with other announced our intention to make application to the Directorate. Worse! Began the witch hunt and we rights records to withdraw and avoid our presence in the Assembly. first time in English democracy opposition that a future application is expelled before a primary election . But the light and had power. Other alternative bid submitted, after being rolled, their candidate was also reprimanded. Now are legion who know what is and what can attest.
In short, I can say, and have evidence for it, I've met from within and at the highest level UPyD party and its leaders. Much of the founding group has abandoned him. Of the parties that I know, I think it is the least democratic internally . His words are very different from their deeds and am convinced that voters disappoint, as I myself and others defrauded hundreds of people who have left too.
The story is quite simple. Rosa Díez and two others convinced us another 120 to accompany them on the foundation of a game. The ideas were clear. In short, they had to offer society a new political option, completely different from existing rules and the mission of regenerating democracy. In this initiative we were adding more and more popular. Soon it began to be signs that did not fit: the impossibility of internal communication to the Bulgarian Political Councils where decisions were previously made, etc. I could give many examples, but suffice to say that the selection Francisco Sosa Wagner (now MEP) as the first of the European list met her in the press long before it was raised at the Council meeting. That did not seem a new party, but more of the same , but the excuses were varied and at first we were thinking of us.
red alarm me particularly when lit from the Directorate (which incidentally was not democratically elected but appointed by Rosa Díez) presented for approval by the Political Council a regulation which literally pulverized the principles and ideas that we had led to the founding of the party. not open lists, no separation of powers, or incompatibility , or anything that was not concentration of power in the service of the Directorate. We filled his mouth with beautiful words to voters and criticism of other parties but we were not internally implement our own recipes. As I did not like, I submitted an amendment to the whole, attempting to recover the regenerative spirit that both spoke. Grave Dare! I felt threatened, I was dismissed, maligned and slandered. Believing that the game would become a worse than those who wanted to fight, along with other announced our intention to make application to the Directorate. Worse! Began the witch hunt and we rights records to withdraw and avoid our presence in the Assembly. first time in English democracy opposition that a future application is expelled before a primary election . But the light and had power. Other alternative bid submitted, after being rolled, their candidate was also reprimanded. Now are legion who know what is and what can attest.
In short, I can say, and have evidence for it, I've met from within and at the highest level UPyD party and its leaders. Much of the founding group has abandoned him. Of the parties that I know, I think it is the least democratic internally . His words are very different from their deeds and am convinced that voters disappoint, as I myself and others defrauded hundreds of people who have left too.
