has passed the first wave. The facts that have been occurring in our party have come to light. Members and sympathizers do not have a single source of information, such as that until recently "sold the bike" of how wonderful it was doing. Now you can not navigate beyond good and evil, wreaking havoc among the members, but with the label autoadjudicada to be the solution to all ills of our society. It is often said that the first step to initiate the cure of many diseases is aware of its existence. Spain now all know that there is a crisis in UPyD. Those who understand a political party as its instrument of promotion, personal or sectarian, can be seen in this publicity disloyalty committed by enemies. Those who understand the parties as conduits for structuring public policy we believe that the public and the political, must be public accounts. Let us also that the crisis has not caused the upwelling of criticism, but both are consequences of the terrible and yet arrogant management of the Directorate.
years ago that there is social demand in Spain of a party that serves as a channel, not a tool, many citizens are dissatisfied with imperfect bipartisanship, abuse and poor quality nationalists that the State is governed. Put another way, we miss a mixture of freedom, progress and honesty in the management of our "Public Res. First we saw the hope of orange with Citizens. Then he turned to magenta * UPyD. Many of us are excited and work for it. It is now time to see whether that organization will be to match what is needed.
Over and against what they could understand the sectarian, meaning that sectarian the dictionary of the RAE in its two meanings: "1. Who profess and follow a cult and 2. Henchman, fanatical and uncompromising, a party or an idea, how important the match is not to triumph over all, but pursuing that purpose for which it was conceived and that both that purpose as how to pursue it is legitimate . So, given that your address can be twisted, it is imperative to ask the party to be straight, even provocative. If this is not possible, for many among whom I find this organization would no longer have legitimacy and coherence, and would no longer ours. In short, in politics it's true loyalty to one's own conscience and before citizens who are trying to represent and serve.
critical awareness among members at last there. The disagreements that before and even now, unfortunately, often become abandoned, and crystallize into collective positions. It has gone from darkness to light, so that we know where we are going and decide whether it is or not. How evenly the Age of Enlightenment absolutism ended **, or how the press was instrumental in the success of the heresies of Luther ***, information and communication have come to stay. This process, which we have witnessed since the beginning, have a turning point. If the "apparatus" is intended legitimize their line, camouflaging or disguising as possible a conference previously castrated, UPyD be lost and many lose interest and affection for him. However, still can be a real fully democratic Constituent Congress. For this, among other things, would have to repeal the current Congressional rules, to rescind the dismissals, appointments and arbitrary files, allow the return of those who were fed up and after all that open a real democratic debate period, including internal elections, under the control of independent and guarantees, not a flawed instrument and submissively sectarian. Returning to the existence
social demand above and the large number of people who were involved in what was first the spirit of Tivoli and then Manifesto UPyD no need to pass the time waiting for a change that does not come by itself, nor malemplearlo in fruitless efforts. It would be a shame to give up that time and that human and political capital. I do not intend to do and I suggest to those who share those ideals that do not either. Attempting to redirect UPyD
, not a dreamer but consistent way, it is difficult but necessary. Whether you get it or not, will not be wasted effort. So far, what is happening was predictable what information was available. I do not think that the reactionaries can say the same. We'll see what the future holds or, rather, work for a better future, which as things are not asking too much.
(*) I remember him saying Rosa Díez, when the foundation of UPyD, the color magenta was a pure and primal. At that time I had the good sense not to contradict it, either publicly or privately. However, the primary colors are red, green and blue, by additive synthesis, or by adding, to compose all visible. The color model is defined technically as well as RGB, English red, green, blue. The magenta is the sum of red and blue, with yellow and cyan, allows form other subtractive colors, ie subtracting the white light by dyes or filters. In the case of printing the black is often added, not theoretical necessity but by the imperfection of the dyes themselves, then called the CMYK model. I guess the problem stems from having repeated what a "qualified employee" I would not really understand. Now, both organizationally and in the legal, also plays expose the collaborators that can bring this project to ruin.
critical awareness among members at last there. The disagreements that before and even now, unfortunately, often become abandoned, and crystallize into collective positions. It has gone from darkness to light, so that we know where we are going and decide whether it is or not. How evenly the Age of Enlightenment absolutism ended **, or how the press was instrumental in the success of the heresies of Luther ***, information and communication have come to stay. This process, which we have witnessed since the beginning, have a turning point. If the "apparatus" is intended legitimize their line, camouflaging or disguising as possible a conference previously castrated, UPyD be lost and many lose interest and affection for him. However, still can be a real fully democratic Constituent Congress. For this, among other things, would have to repeal the current Congressional rules, to rescind the dismissals, appointments and arbitrary files, allow the return of those who were fed up and after all that open a real democratic debate period, including internal elections, under the control of independent and guarantees, not a flawed instrument and submissively sectarian. Returning to the existence
social demand above and the large number of people who were involved in what was first the spirit of Tivoli and then Manifesto UPyD no need to pass the time waiting for a change that does not come by itself, nor malemplearlo in fruitless efforts. It would be a shame to give up that time and that human and political capital. I do not intend to do and I suggest to those who share those ideals that do not either. Attempting to redirect UPyD
, not a dreamer but consistent way, it is difficult but necessary. Whether you get it or not, will not be wasted effort. So far, what is happening was predictable what information was available. I do not think that the reactionaries can say the same. We'll see what the future holds or, rather, work for a better future, which as things are not asking too much.
(*) I remember him saying Rosa Díez, when the foundation of UPyD, the color magenta was a pure and primal. At that time I had the good sense not to contradict it, either publicly or privately. However, the primary colors are red, green and blue, by additive synthesis, or by adding, to compose all visible. The color model is defined technically as well as RGB, English red, green, blue. The magenta is the sum of red and blue, with yellow and cyan, allows form other subtractive colors, ie subtracting the white light by dyes or filters. In the case of printing the black is often added, not theoretical necessity but by the imperfection of the dyes themselves, then called the CMYK model. I guess the problem stems from having repeated what a "qualified employee" I would not really understand. Now, both organizationally and in the legal, also plays expose the collaborators that can bring this project to ruin.
(**) There was a theory of divine origin of power (based on John's Gospel Jn 19, 1 and collected from other por el Papa León XIII, en su encíclica Diuturnum illud, sobre la autoridad política, junio 1881), según la cuál los gobernantes recibían la legitimidad para el ejercicio del poder directamente de Dios. Además del origen “divino directo”, para justificar la dulcificación de las monarquías supervivientes, se acuñó la teoría del origen del poder “divino indirecto”, por la que tanto el origen era el mismo (Dios) como el destinatario (el monarca o gobernante), pero en ese camino pasaba, sin detenerse claro está, por el pueblo. El régimen de Franco, por ejemplo, decía considerarlo así. Nada diferente de los actuales populismos, tanto a nivel de estados as parties.
(***) We must recognize the wisdom of Savater to bring up the heresies and consider necessary in politics. Striking the many parallels, for example between the laying of the 95 theses on the door of Castle Church in Wittenberg and the documents of the "heretics" estanoeslawebdeupyd. Also excommunication (which are nothing to expulsion from the womb of the Church), the inquisitors (remember here the existence of a weak character and political stature but nicknamed by his conduct from long ago), etc. Hopefully not reach the fires and schism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment